France urged to rethink nuclear strategy amidst rising threats
The French nuclear arsenal, consisting of 290 warheads, may not meet the new strategic challenges in Europe. Experts emphasize the need to adapt the doctrine to the changing realities.
Key information
- The French nuclear arsenal consists of 290 warheads.
- Experts question its sufficiency in the context of "extended deterrence."
- New threats include Russia, China, and potential US withdrawal from Europe.
France, as the only nuclear power in the European Union, possesses 290 nuclear warheads. However, according to "Le Figaro," this potential may not be enough to ensure the safety of all Europe in the face of new threats.
With 290 warheads, France, the only nuclear-armed power in the European Union, adheres to the logic of "strict sufficiency." However, some experts believe that this doctrine may no longer fit the new strategic context, notes "Le Figaro."
Experts indicate that France's current doctrine, based on a "strictly sufficient" potential, no longer aligns with the new realities. Increasing threats from Russia and China and the possibility of the United States withdrawing from Europe are key factors that may require a change in approach.
The need for a new strategy
The American think tank Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) suggests that France and the United Kingdom should moderately increase their arsenals. Europe should also develop a new security strategy to address these challenges.
Héloïse Fayet from the French Institute of International Relations (IFRI) emphasizes that the reflection on the future of the nuclear arsenal is just beginning. "The issue of the number of warheads is premature," but increasing their number could reassure allies. Fayet notes that reinforcing conventional defence capabilities in Europe is more important at the moment.
In summary, France faces the challenge of adapting its nuclear doctrine to changing geopolitical conditions. Will increasing the number of warheads be the answer to these challenges? The question remains open.