NewsWhite House muddles China tariff rates amid conflicting details

White House muddles China tariff rates amid conflicting details

Representatives of the White House have provided conflicting information regarding tariffs on goods from China. They are set to reach 54%, with some Chinese goods potentially subject to tariffs as high as 79%. U.S. officials described these concerns as a "pointless aside."

Tariffs on China could reach as much as 79 percent.
Tariffs on China could reach as much as 79 percent.
Images source: © Getty Images | Pool
Robert Kędzierski

Donald Trump initiated a trade war with China during his first presidential term by imposing a series of tariffs on the world's second-largest economy. At that time, he imposed tariffs reaching 25% on goods valued at $350 (£267) billion. The Biden administration has maintained these tariffs, and some have even been increased, according to Barrons.

In February of this year, Trump imposed an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, justifying it with issues related to fentanyl and China's involvement in trafficking this drug. He subsequently raised these rates by an additional 10%. Before Wednesday’s announcement, this meant that the tariff rate on some goods from China was already 45%.

Uncertainties in administration communication

During a briefing for journalists before Trump's announcement, officials did not provide detailed information on the new rate for China under the so-called "reciprocal tariffs." They only informed that new tariffs would be imposed on existing ones. A high-ranking administration official explained that the rates "are customised to each country" based on "very, very well established methodologies."

Trump mentioned China in his speech, but did not specify a number. However, the list of individual tariffs distributed during the event and published on government social media accounts contained this information. The administration calculated that China effectively imposes a 67% tariff on the U.S., taking into account both tariffs and non-tariff barriers such as currency manipulation, export subsidies, and unfair regulations. This number was then halved – Trump described it as a "discount" – and rounded up to 34%.

Neither the president nor the executive order explained, however, whether this number was to be added to the existing 45% tariffs on imports from China. In response to a question from a Bloomberg TV reporter about whether the rate for China would exceed 50%, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent answered affirmatively. However, the reporter did not ask about the 25% tariffs introduced during Trump’s first term. Including Wednesday’s announcement, Trump added 54% in new tariffs during his second term.

A White House representative, who requested anonymity, initially confirmed in an email that the 34% reciprocal tariff would be added to the existing 45%. This would imply a new rate of 79% for goods already subject to full tariffs.

However, ten minutes later, the same official corrected the information, claiming that the rate for China was 54%, not 79%, because "Venezuelan tariffs" were not yet in effect. This likely referred to Trump's threats to impose 25% tariffs on countries importing oil from Venezuela, including China.

After further clarification, the final response was that the United States would impose tariffs of up to 79% on some Chinese goods when the new tariff package comes into effect. A White House official commented on the whole confusion with stating: "With everything else that unfolded today this seems like a pointless aside to spend any energy on."

Andy Rothman, a longtime observer of China and head of the Sinology organisation focused on China, expressed his concern over the lack of clarity: "They haven't provided their homework," he stated. He also added that the lack of details regarding the reciprocal tariff could complicate China's potential response.

The question of whether these reciprocal tariffs would accumulate was one of the key issues raised by investors and analysts before the announcement. After the event, Henrietta Treyz, Director of Economic Policy Research at Veda Partners, noted that uncertainty regarding the rate for China was particularly evident. Rothman also admitted that he felt bewildered by the whole situation.

Related content