Next-gen Abrams tank aims for rapid development revolution
The American future tank construction program, currently developed under M1E3, is gaining momentum. In 2022, GDLS showcased a technology demonstrator called AbramsX, and the program's schedule plans for the new tank to be developed in just 2.5 years. What do we know about this equipment?
The GDLS (General Dynamics Land Systems) company is developing the new tank under the name M1E3, which will likely be changed to M1A3 once the vehicle enters service. Maintaining continuity of designations (previous versions of the Abrams are M1, M1A1, and M1A2), as well as the demonstrator's name – AbramsX – suggests that the new equipment will be the next stage in the evolution of the already over 40-year-old Abrams tank.
This is a misleading conclusion. Although many Abrams components will be found in the new tank, the extent of the changes is so significant that it will practically be a completely new construction despite retaining the name. Work is being carried out to modernize the currently operated tank, partly due to easier financing when conducting such a project.
However, work on the new tank does not mean, as noted by Defence 24, the complete abandonment of the development of the current Abrams variant, the M1A2SEPv3 tank. Although the development of the M1A2SEPv4 version was halted, the improvements it was to introduce have not been abandoned. They are still being developed and will gradually reach the tanks operated as part of the AUP (Abrams Upgrade Program) modernization program.
However, most resources have been redirected from upgrading the Abrams to building the next-generation vehicle. In 2022, GDLS revealed a technology demonstrator called AbramsX, a preliminary vision of the new tank and the solutions that will be applied in it. Compared to the currently operated Abrams tanks—including those purchased by Poland—the extent of the changes is very significant.
The M1E3/M1A3 tank – the future of American armoured weaponry
The construction layout of the new tank will likely change. Following current trends, the M1E3 will feature an unmanned turret with an autoloader. This will reduce the vehicle's crew from four to three people while simultaneously allowing the entire crew to be placed in the tank's hull.
This means the space designated for the crew will be significantly smaller than it is now, making it easier to secure with armour of the intended resistance. The crew's chances of survival will also increase due to their placement low in the tank, in a less hit-prone area, and the complete separation of the ammunition storage (which is also the case with the currently operated Abrams tanks).
The tank will also receive a new drive system. Instead of the turbine typical for Abrams, the M1E3 will feature a hybrid drive utilizing a diesel engine developed by Cummins, the ACE (Advanced Combat Engine), offering 50% more power from the same volume, a 20% reduction in generated heat, and 13% lower fuel consumption. The new Abrams is to receive the most powerful variant of the futuristic drive – the ACE1500.
It will probably be combined with an electric drive and a new system responsible for generating, storing, and distributing electricity. This solution is intended to address the increasing energy demand necessary for operating tank electronics and various systems responsible for communication, target detection, and self-defence.
The new Abrams with the old cannon
The component that will remain common with the "old" Abrams tanks is the M256 120 mm cannon. The Americans see no need to increase the calibre of the main armament.
In contrast to the French working on tanks (who plan to use the ASCALON cannon of 140 mm calibre), the Germans (130 mm), or the Russians (152 mm), the Pentagon considers the currently widespread 120 mm calibre to be completely sufficient for destroying current and future targets. However, this does not exclude further increasing firepower not by growing calibre but through work on more effective tank ammunition.
The M1E3 in context with other future tanks
Reference to projects conducted by other countries is warranted for another reason: the pace of work being conducted. The Russians were the first to present their "future tank," but the tank (and the entire platform) shown in 2014, T-14 Armata, turned out to be an embarrassing misstep.
For a decade, the Russian industry has been unable to bring it to a state where the tank would be suitable for combat. Of the thousands of promised units, probably no more than 100 have been ordered (and significantly fewer produced). Technical challenges, such as building a suitable engine, have proven so serious that the Uralvagonzavod plants are announcing the intention to create a new, breakthrough design instead of trying to meet them. Considering the capabilities of the Russian industry, this announcement should be regarded as unlikely.
The European future tank, built by France and Germany under the MGCS program, is announced as a very ambitious project (a whole family of combat vehicles is to be created) but simultaneously extremely distant. Over eight years of work, the partners have not been able to determine what the future European tank should be, and the implementation of the new equipment is being postponed to the mid-2040s.
Against this backdrop, the pace of the Americans stands out. The initial schedule, which assumed the construction of the new tank within 60 months, has been cancelled and replaced with a much more ambitious one, predicting that the M1E3 will be developed in 24-30 months, or no more than 2.5 years.
To meet the deadline, the Pentagon is ready for many compromises: project-related bureaucracy and procedural issues have been minimized, and the contractor, i.e., GDLS, has been given free rein in selecting partners or specific solutions.
At the same time, the financing of the work being carried out has been fully secured. The military also allows for the possibility that at the beginning of its development path, the American future tank may not meet all the set requirements – which are to be refined over time.
The Pentagon's technical revolution
The previous equipment revolution, known as the "Big Five," took place in the 1980s. During that time, the M1 Abrams tank, M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, Patriot anti-aircraft system, as well as AH-64 Apache and UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters were introduced into service.
Similarly, ambitious intentions accompany the current modernization programs. The new tank is set to enter production at the turn of the decade, keeping pace with other US Army initiatives described as the "Super Big 5."
These include the introduction of a new tank, a new infantry fighting vehicle (XM30 program—successor to the M2 Bradley), a transport helicopter (FLRAA program—successor to the Black Hawk), anti-aircraft and missile defence systems (programs M-SHORAD and IFPC Inc 2), and new-generation artillery (the discontinued XM1299 ERCA program).
The first "Big Five" gave the US Army technical dominance over the rest of the world for 50 years. If the programs within the "Super Big 5" are successfully realized, the US Army faces a technical revolution akin to the past half-century. The M1E3 tank, or the "new Abrams" with the ultimate designation M1A3, will be a significant element of this revolution.