Stalemate diplomacy: Finland's Stubb challenges Russia's truce
The President of Finland, Alexander Stubb, skeptically assessed the Russian proposal for a temporary ceasefire. According to him, it is a typical Kremlin tactic, and Moscow may use the ceasefire to criticize Ukraine. Stubb advocated for a 90-day unconditional cessation of hostilities.
What do you need to know?
- The President of Finland, Alexander Stubb, does not believe in the permanence of the ceasefire proposed by Vladimir Putin. During a speech at the University of Vaasa, he expressed concerns that Russia might blame Ukraine for violating the ceasefire.
- Russia proposed a temporary suspension of hostilities for 72 hours from May 8 to 10. This is related to the celebration of the end of World War II 80 years ago and Victory Day in Russia.
- The USA proposed a permanent ceasefire, which Ukraine accepted, but Russia did not agree. President Stubb emphasized that this is a traditional Russian tactic, playing for time.
Is Putin's truce just a stalling tactic?
During his speech at the University of Vaasa, Stubb referred to the 72-hour ceasefire plan announced by Putin on Monday for May 8–10—a period that includes the anniversaries of the end of World War II and Russia's Victory Day celebrations.
What are the alternatives to the temporary truce?
Stubb noted that the United States presented a proposal for a permanent ceasefire, which Ukraine accepted and Europe supported, but Russia rejected it. "This is a typical Russian stalling tactic," he remarked, adding that Moscow has repeatedly violated similar agreements.
The Finnish president advocated for a 90-day immediate and unconditional ceasefire. "I also presented this proposal to US President Donald Trump," he said.
He believes Trump's patience with Russia's actions is wearing thin.
Stubb reiterated that Finland will not recognize the annexation of Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia and emphasized that international pressure on the Kremlin must be consistently maintained.
