TechUkrainian HIMARS strike cripples Russian helicopter site

Ukrainian HIMARS strike cripples Russian helicopter site

The Ukrainians, using the M142 HIMARS system equipped with M30A1/A2 rockets, attacked a Russian helicopter landing site near Belgorod. The targets included Mi-8 and Mi-28 helicopters. Below are the effects of the attack and details on the equipment used by the Ukrainians.

Russian Mi-28N with shrapnel marks from the AW warhead.
Russian Mi-28N with shrapnel marks from the AW warhead.
Images source: © Telegram
Przemysław Juraszek

Ukrainian special forces identified the landing site, and then GMLRS rockets in the M30A1/A2 version, designed specifically for area engagement of light targets, were deployed.

M30A1/A2 rockets vs. Russian helicopters — one definitely won't fly again

Initial reports from the Ukrainian Main Intelligence Directorate mentioned four helicopters. However, the video below and information from the Russia-linked Fighterbomber account on Telegram suggest two helicopters were hit. The transport Mi-8 suffered the most damage and will likely be used only for spare parts.

The situation is more promising for the Mi-28N. While it sustained punctured fuel tanks and damage to its optoelectronic heads and electronic warfare pods, the critical components and pilot cabin, thanks to additional armour, seem to be less affected. The helicopter might return to service after a few months of repairs.

M30A1/A2 rockets — rain of 182,000 tungsten fragments

Based on the markings seen on the helicopters, several GMLRS rockets in the M30A1 or A2 version likely impacted the landing site. These rockets entered production in 2015 for the M30A1 and 2019 for the M30A2, with the main difference being the use of insensitive explosive material, making accidental detonation less likely.

Apart from this, they are similar rockets featuring inertial and satellite navigation, with a range of about 80 kilometres, and they contain an AW (Alternative Warhead) that releases 182,000 tungsten fragments. When programmed to explode at a height of approximately 9 metres above ground, they provide an area effect akin to controversial cluster munitions, without leaving unexploded ordnance.

The primary drawbacks include the cost and limited piercing capabilities, as the fragments can penetrate bulletproof vests, missile bodies, and tankers but are ineffective against armor plates or bulletproof glass that can withstand resistance from .50 calibre bullets.

Related content