Misinterpretation nearly leads to closure of Social Security office
The head of the government agency responsible for distributing retirement benefits to millions of older and ailing Americans has reversed his decision and will not close the office. It turned out that he misunderstood the court ruling.
What do you need to know?
- Federal court decision: The ruling permits the Department of State Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, to access documents, provided that personal data is removed.
- Dudek's reaction: Leland Dudek initially interpreted the ruling as necessitating the closure of the office, which caused concern among retirees.
- Social protests: A protest was held in White Plains, New York, against the closure of the local Social Security office.
Leland Dudek, the head of the Social Security Administration, initially announced that the federal court ruling forced him to close the office. He claimed that restricting access to data made it impossible for the agency to operate. However, after explanations from Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander, who pointed out that the ruling does not require closure, Dudek withdrew this decision.
The confusion caused by Dudek alarmed retirees. On Saturday in White Plains, New York, there was a protest attended by over 100 people, including retirees and union leaders. Protesters shared their concerns, holding banners with slogans emphasising their reliance on benefits.
Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander clarified that the ruling permits the Department of State Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, to access documents, provided that personal data is removed. Social Security Administration employees can still use full records, which means there is no threat to the payment of benefits. - Any suggestion that the Order may require the delay or suspension of benefit payments is incorrect, Hollander emphasised.
After the court's explanations, Leland Dudek confirmed that the Social Security Administration will continue its operations without disruptions.
